Reach us: 7304553123 / mktg@projectstoday.com
Help
1. Boolean Searches :

i. AND - Shows results where both terms on either side of the 'AND' operator are present. 'AND' must be in upper case. For example search term - delhi AND metro result - It will return records in which 'delhi' as well as 'metro' both are present.

ii. OR - Shows results where either term (or both terms) is present. 'OR' must be in upper case. For example search term - delhi OR metro result - It will return records in which either 'delhi' or 'metro' or both are present

2. Proximity Searches

A proximity search looks for terms that are within a specific distance from one another. For example, search term - 'delhi metro'~10 result - It will search for records where 'delhi' and 'metro' are found within 10 words of each other

3. Phrase searches

You can search phrases using double quotes. for e.g. 'delhi metro' result - It will return records where 'delhi metro' phrase is found.

CMPDI to submit report on Rajmahal opencast mining project in May

Thursday, 25 Apr 2002
Share this on :

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute (CMPDI), a subsidiary of Coal India, would be submitting its report on the expansion of the Rajmahal opencast mining project in May 2002.

 

The mines falls under the administration of Eastern Coalfields and an expansion from 10.5 million tonnes to 17 million tonnes is envisaged at these mines.

 

It may be recalled that Metchem of Canada, had submitted a feasibility report on the mining project in September 2001. However, according to ECL the project cost mentioned in the report was very high. Thus, ECL had asked CMPDI to prepare a feasibility report on the project, which could then be compared with that of Metchem.

 

It may be mentioned that in 1993, ECL had approved the expansion of the Rajmahal mining project, in anticipation of the addition requirement of power grade coal by National Thermal Power Corporation for its Farakka power project and Kahalgaon super thermal power project in West Bengal and Bihar, respectively.

 

In fact, CMPDI had also prepared and submitted a draft report to ECL in January 2001, while the final report was to be submitted in April 2001. However, due to a resource crunch the final report was kept in abeyance. Later, following Metchem’s interest in the project, the Canadian company was asked to prepare a report on the project. But, the report so prepared showed a very high cost and thus ECL asked CMPDI to prepare a fresh report for comparison with that of Metchem’s.

New Password
Confirm Password